cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Police investigated by the IOPC
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56368531
JK2006 So this is how it goes. The IOPC are not just toothless; they exist to protect bent cops. They have already decided Surrey Police failed properly to investigate my complaints that they covered up misconduct and possible crimes committed by officers (such as contributing to, or causing, deaths). And they declared Surrey Police had been punished enough (by suffering bad media publicity - diddums). They will either find the Met did not breach discipline OR that bent cops should be punished by having to go onto a "management course" (an afternoon in Milton Keynes being told not to use pencils in notebooks).

And most of the media happily colludes with this shit. After all, cops deliver GREAT stories. Keep 'em sweet.