IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Hillsborough Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Green Man
Wyot wrote: Gael Vella wrote: Honey wrote: The admission of guilt is what is important
That does absolutely nothing for injured parties
And often just confirms the blindingly obvious...
Only if you look at life like a spreadsheet...
I want that engraved on my headstone.
Wyot
Gael Vella wrote: Honey wrote: The admission of guilt is what is important
That does absolutely nothing for injured parties
And often just confirms the blindingly obvious...
Only if you look at life like a spreadsheet...
Gael Vella
Honey wrote: The admission of guilt is what is important
That does absolutely nothing for injured parties
And often just confirms the blindingly obvious...
Honey
Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: steveimp wrote: Green Man wrote: Gael Vella wrote: You're correct. The cause of the tragedy was a non-functional ground.
With inadequate turnstiles and terraces - and dangerous overcrowding.
All authorised by local/government bodies; the laws changed soon afterwards.
I have no idea on the stadium layout then or now; however the newspapers lied and so did the police for a quick buck.
Is The Sun newspaper still hard to buy in Liverpool Honey ?
There were ticketless supporters there and the policing was completely inappropriate and incompetent to deal. Add to that the old fences around the grounds and it was always going to lead to what it lead to...
Thank you for the pointless article. I knew that that info years ago. For your information I hate football.
Well for YOUR information, it was neither directed at, or replying to you, but was demonstrating that media lies, long disproved, are what people remember.
Anyone who believes the MSM needs their brains examined especially the newspapers.
Not at all. We just tend to remember the first thing we hear, and unless you have a particular interest, you wouldn't normally seek out new information.
I blame nobody but the people who lied about it.
I read numerous papers and online forums but I still I have my own opinion.
If it was me I would snub the pay out. You can't put a price on a loss of life but someone should be jailed at least even if it's a Sun journalist.
I don't really agree with the concept of compensation, but that is just me.
The admission of guilt is what is important.
Green Man
Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: steveimp wrote: Green Man wrote: Gael Vella wrote: You're correct. The cause of the tragedy was a non-functional ground.
With inadequate turnstiles and terraces - and dangerous overcrowding.
All authorised by local/government bodies; the laws changed soon afterwards.
I have no idea on the stadium layout then or now; however the newspapers lied and so did the police for a quick buck.
Is The Sun newspaper still hard to buy in Liverpool Honey ?
There were ticketless supporters there and the policing was completely inappropriate and incompetent to deal. Add to that the old fences around the grounds and it was always going to lead to what it lead to...
Thank you for the pointless article. I knew that that info years ago. For your information I hate football.
Well for YOUR information, it was neither directed at, or replying to you, but was demonstrating that media lies, long disproved, are what people remember.
Anyone who believes the MSM needs their brains examined especially the newspapers.
Not at all. We just tend to remember the first thing we hear, and unless you have a particular interest, you wouldn't normally seek out new information.
I blame nobody but the people who lied about it.
I read numerous papers and online forums but I still I have my own opinion.