King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Former Poster wrote:[/b]
[quote]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9698711/Shame-rape-justice-sex-offence-convictions-tumble.html

''Deeply ashamed' ministers apologise for convicting just 1,439 rapists out of 128,000 rapes committed in the UK in a year and 43,187 that were reported to police'

'The review blamed the collapse on intrusive police probes into victims' digital communications and court and investigative delays.'

Are we to assume 'victims' are simply to be believed, and what is often the only evidence to back up claims will be ignored?

In the same article the reason why we have these extensive checks.

'A government source said there was concern the justice system had become over-cautious after the 2017 case of Liam Allen, a student wrongly accused of rape.

It emerged that a huge database of electronic messages had not been disclosed to his defence team which proved the complainant had pestered him for 'casual sex'. Sources said the 'pendulum had swung too far the other way'.'[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Bad news for justice
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author

Message

Former Poster

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9698711...victions-tumble.html

''Deeply ashamed' ministers apologise for convicting just 1,439 rapists out of 128,000 rapes committed in the UK in a year and 43,187 that were reported to police'

'The review blamed the collapse on intrusive police probes into victims' digital communications and court and investigative delays.'

Are we to assume 'victims' are simply to be believed, and what is often the only evidence to back up claims will be ignored?

In the same article the reason why we have these extensive checks.

'A government source said there was concern the justice system had become over-cautious after the 2017 case of Liam Allen, a student wrongly accused of rape.

It emerged that a huge database of electronic messages had not been disclosed to his defence team which proved the complainant had pestered him for 'casual sex'. Sources said the 'pendulum had swung too far the other way'.'