cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: I have to say this "incitement to murder" sentence is disgraceful
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Anthony The point you make there is a good one, Phil. I lose respect for anyone who advocates such forms of punishment.

Maybe there is a distinction though between someone advocating the castration or hanging of criminals, however distasteful I find that, and groups calling for the mass destruction of those they disagree with. The former are calling for a change in the law through the existing democratic process, whilst the latter are after something quite different.

Nonetheless your point illustrates the risks we take once the state starts making decisions about what we are allowed to think. I am still to be totally convinced either way.
Phil Anthony wrote:
Legislation against ideas and thoughts is indeed alarming. On the other hand I don't want to see white supremacists, (have you ever seen a group of people less supreme?), Islamic extremists who want to bring an end to democracy and replace it with the law of their imaginary friend, or any other group spewing out their hatred on our streets.

I am questioning myself even as I write this. I realise the risks of curbing people's rights to express their opinions, but I believe a line has to be drawn somewhere. If you preach to bring down democracy and human rights, do you have a right to enjoy all its benefits? I would say no, but I could be wrong and would be interested in hearing other opinions.

And as for the frenzied groups who love burning flags, you are not burning my flag. You are burning yours. You bought it. Idiots!


I agree with what you say and I would not support any calls for violence under any circumstances but I beleive that legislation should only be used if there is a direct threat to a person or group of people.

How many times have we heard the call from compassionate caring upright individuals who advocate castrating paedophiles and hanging murderers ? Certainly they are suggesting violent action against minority groups, should they be prosecuted ?
zooloo In Britain it is very easy to "talk beteewn the lines".

There are phrases that my audience will fully comprehend with no need for me to actually mention "Let's kill those who are different".

For somebody to be successfully prosecuted they must have been either a bit dim or a complete nutter.

Once again we do seem to be dealing with half a story, what the person's actually said is missing.
Solihull Exile All the mass immigration has changed the face of Britain,for both good and bad.
Part of the bad side has been the lack of respect for British traditions of democracy and free speech,especially from a vocal minority amongst these immigrants families.
After the 2005 bombings we're now less tolerant of them,and of course the more publicity they get,well the more radical they'll become to keep the bandwagon rolling.
With mass communications you do have to do something to curb calls for violence.Afterall only a few people will see some jackass screaming from speaker's corner in Hyde park,but with Satellite TV,and the net millions will see these bad things almost as they happen.
Inciting violence onto others is not freedom of speech,but neither were these sentences a just responce.This matter needs thought,and proper thought for a practical way to handle it,not bigitory,or at the other extreme political correctness.
Anthony Legislation against ideas and thoughts is indeed alarming. On the other hand I don't want to see white supremacists, (have you ever seen a group of people less supreme?), Islamic extremists who want to bring an end to democracy and replace it with the law of their imaginary friend, or any other group spewing out their hatred on our streets.

I am questioning myself even as I write this. I realise the risks of curbing people's rights to express their opinions, but I believe a line has to be drawn somewhere. If you preach to bring down democracy and human rights, do you have a right to enjoy all its benefits? I would say no, but I could be wrong and would be interested in hearing other opinions.

And as for the frenzied groups who love burning flags, you are not burning my flag. You are burning yours. You bought it. Idiots!