King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Different Covid View
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Wyot	GM - you know there is no one in the online world I would rather fall on my sword for Honey - yes very true. So the patent is about as unspecific in 2015 (even if the word Covid is there) as a biblical prophecy....
Honey	The word "covid" just means COrona VIrus Disease,(common cold family) so probably already existed.
Green Man	Wyot wrote: Green Man wrote: rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/04/18/...ts-in-2015-and-2017/ The way it is set out is quite hard to follow, but to me they they are only saying the 2020 patent was a continuation of a patent originated in 2015. I think Reuters are saying the same thing. The disagreement is about prior knowledge of Covid & planning. They seem very hung up on semantics - but are not denying that the word "covid" was only used in the 2020 patent I think? They read a lot into the earlier patents being a sign of intent that this technology would be used for Covid in particular and knew this in 2015. But I still can't see any evidence that establishes this. It may be how it is written but does it say anywhere (or better show) the word Covid was used in the 2015 patent? Now that would be interesting...! It seems to me the likeliest explanation is the patent was adapted to deal with Covid; not that Covid was known about & planned and an originating patent taken out in 2015. Sorry GM doesn't convince me; but it may come out in time I am hopelessly naieve! I can wait.
Wyot	Green Man wrote: rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/04/18/...ts-in-2015-and-2017/ The way it is set out is quite hard to follow, but to me they they are only saying the 2020 patent was a continuation of a patent originated in 2015. I think Reuters are saying the same thing. The disagreement is about prior knowledge of Covid & planning. They seem very hung up on semantics - but are not denying that the word "covid" was only used in the 2020 patent I think? They read a lot into the earlier patents being a sign of intent that this technology would be used for Covid in particular and knew this in 2015. But I still can't see any evidence that establishes this. It may be how it is written but does it say anywhere (or better show) the word Covid was used in the 2015 patent? Now that would be interesting...! It seems to me the likeliest explanation is the patent was adapted to deal with Covid; not that Covid was known about & planned and an originating patent taken out in 2015. Sorry GM doesn't convince me; but it may come out in time I am hopelessly naieve!
Honey	Green Man wrote: www.luckinlove.com/rothmedia.htm Good for the Rothschilds?