IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Meghan wins again
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
JK2006 |
As usual I tend to be in the middle; they have faults and have done silly things. Media has been fair at times, not at others but always only looking at what is the best story; Buck P is trying to cope with new media, new century, changing attitudes and sometimes succeeds sometimes fails. People make false allegations for many reasons, often misunderstandings. Meghan has faults; so does her Dad. Harry blames media for too much but they were to blame for a great deal. None of it is simple; all is complex and nobody, these days, seems able to avoid simplicity. |
|
Honey |
JK2006 wrote:
As I said Honey, these days it seems impossible to change peoples' opinions. I'm bound to see the media as the villains, having experienced some of their behaviour. You're bound to be against Meghan & Harry since you see them as dodgy characters. This is the new Century!
I don't "see" them as dodgy characters. Some of their proven antics have been disgusting, true, but it can happen with unwell people.
I am also very open to the suggestion (as stated in previous post about Knauf) that some of their claims might well be true. |
|
JK2006 |
As I said Honey, these days it seems impossible to change peoples' opinions. I'm bound to see the media as the villains, having experienced some of their behaviour. You're bound to be against Meghan & Harry since you see them as dodgy characters. This is the new Century! |
|
Honey |
I am not sure who comes out of the court case
worst.
Meghan's inclusion of the word "daddy" to "pull at the heartstrings" if it was leaked was absolutely repulsive, BUT, it makes you wonder what sort of people are running the palace, that makes this kind of behaviour acceptable?
Jason Knauf is hailed as a hero. I disagree.
If someone who worked for me pulled a stunt like that I would be immediately expressing my disgust, not going along with it, as he did.
So, if we can assume that Jason Knauf is a manipulative little shit, how can we believe his evidence about Meghan's "bullying"? I am thinking that this might be the real purpose behind the trivial and unnecessary court case?
On the other hand, now that we have seen evidence of manipulation, combined with the multiple contradictions from Harry in the Oprah fiasco, we are not going to believe their wild claims of racism in their own family, so this will be beneficial to Prince Charles in his upcoming libel case. |
|
JK2006 |
Clearly I've not examined the detail as much as I should have Honey. I thought the court case was over (it certainly is now). Her use of the word COULD influenced me. I thought the TV show was excellent, very balanced and fair, but what do I know?
Mr Knauf said Meghan sent him an early draft of the letter and had written: "Obviously everything I have drafted is with the understanding that it could be leaked so I have been meticulous in my word choice, but please do let me know if anything stands out for you as a liability."
But in her written evidence, Meghan denied she thought it likely that her father would leak the letter, but "merely recognised that this was a possibility". |
|
|
|
|
