King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Princess Bea's favourite teacher...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
In The Know	JK2006 wrote: 2) In days gone by when police used to flash queens in toilets, incitement to commit a crime was a crime itself. Will the fake 12 year old who seduced this man into talking dirty to her (if he did) be arrested and tried? See answer is "Shagging (at work) is OK" post ! (ie Who can remember ANY policeman ever being punished satisfactorily?)
Andrew York	Excellent point. If I phone you and ask "would you like
JK2006	Richard Findley pleads guilty to texting dirty to a 12 year old who wasn't but was an undercover internet cop. Well, apart from reminding you about "Plead Guilty" (many innocent people are told to plead guilty by their lawyers in order to get reduced sentences) and wondering what on earth induces anyone to talk dirty to a 12 year old, isn't there a serious problem here? 1) No 12 year old was talked dirty to. The line between committing a crime and an imaginary crime is increasingly blurred. We really should be arresting crime writers these days. Surely no victim equals no crime? 2) In days gone by when police used to flash queens in toilets, incitement to commit a crime was a crime itself. Will the fake 12 year old who seduced this man into talking dirty to her (if he did) be arrested and tried?