cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Nobody takes this seriously
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Wyot Just realised you are talking about NATO and me the UN.

I will go back to 😴....now
Wyot As Russia is one of the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council, presumably it could just veto any deployment of UN peacekeepers to Ukraine? But it is an interesting question 1. Is there away to deploy without a unanimous vote? and 2. If yes then why is/has this not been looked at?
JK2006 but I still feel that if 600,000 NATO peacekeepers (20,000 from each member state) enters Ukraine, unarmed, in bright PEACE jackets and a 20 people team stops every tank or vehicle and says "OK; no violence but you have the following choices. Turn around and leave Ukraine or be arrested, your tank or vehicle taken and disarmed and you will be placed in prison here in Ukraine". If Russian violence is threatened the two UKRAINIAN soldiers with each twenty man peacekeeping unit will shoot to kill. As is their right.

Simples.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk