cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Savile myth used in court.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Honey s/8--Jo wrote:
It's absurd, but probably an effective approach by the prosecution. It does sound as if this individual had left an electronic and financial trail, however.

There seems little doubt in this case, but the next person might be innocent.
Jo It's absurd, but probably an effective approach by the prosecution. It does sound as if this individual had left an electronic and financial trail, however.
Honey I am absolutely horrified that what we must assume is a fairy tale (because we are all innocent until proven guilty) was used to persuade the jury to convict someone else.

Savile was listed alongside convicted child attackers to demonstrate that just because someone is a dj and of good character doesn't mean they are not a paedophile.

We might just as well not bother with court at all because this is beyond ludicrous!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1059474...g-rape-children.html