King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Andrew and The Queen
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Horatio	It's anachronistic and wrong to have non-military individuals (who never served) being saluted by regiments during parades and march pasts. The regimental 'head' (and similar roles) should be appointed from those former and decorated members of the particular service section. Royal involvement makes no sense these days and harps back to the days when monarchs led their troops into battle. And that hasn't happened for a while!
hedda	Phil Space & Glenda Slagg still pretending they have spoken to "royal insiders"
Horatio	What's ironic to me is that the only current Royals, who served in the military and were involved in actual warfare (putting their lives at risk), are barred from receiving honorary titles Like regiment heads, generals, commanders-in-chief etc. Those chosen never wore a true military uniform. But persona-non-grata like Harry and Andrew are ignored.
Honey	JK2006 wrote: Started a new thread as the old one has got so crowded. Yes JO - totally agree with you. I'm a huge fan of The Queen and the whole Royal Family; though I know no more about them than anyone else, I do know a lot about both the Media and the False Allegations Industry. It is my fervent wish that anyone who goes along with False Allegations has it happen to them. I'd say "like it happened to Max Clifford" except I really believe his accuser was genuine (she did not exaggerate at all which she would have done, were she a false accuser). I think the way The Queen has dealt with this is SO classy and SO intelligent. What a great lady she is. An example to us all. Rather than choosing to publicly support Andrew, I think The Queen might simply have chosen to travel with the only child who was coming without a partner?
JK2006	Started a new thread as the old one has got so crowded. Yes JO - totally agree with you. I'm a huge fan of The Queen and the whole Royal Family; though I know no more about them than anyone else, I do know a lot about both the Media and the False Allegations Industry. It is my fervent wish that anyone who goes along with False Allegations has it happen to them. I'd say "like it happened to Max Clifford" except I really believe his accuser was genuine (she did not exaggerate at all which she would have done, were she a false accuser). I think the way The Queen has dealt with this is SO classy and SO intelligent. What a great lady she is. An example to us all.