IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Where are the feminists? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Green Man
I don't know any bloke in my social circles who were treated for cervical cancer.
I don't any biological woman with a junk either.
I should be Keir's private tutor. Look Keir a no nonsense sex ed video for you and with pictures !
Honey
Green Man wrote: Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Wyot wrote: Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.
Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).
Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.
So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.
Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.
No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.
I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.
But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?
Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.
Yet, women demand safe spaces we gave them that and rightly so. However it shouldn't be abused whatsoever. Don't get me started on the non- binary nonsense.
I wouldn't want my daughters to have some bloke in a skirt loitering in the changing rooms in a clothes shop. Just like any sensible woman wouldn't want to be looked at whilst getting changed.
The left have now backed themselves in a corner and have no idea what to do without offending people, however they are offending women. (ones with wombs, breasts, uterus, vaginas, menopausal or the ones who menustrate )
If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is then DNA testing needs to be done.
If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is, Head testing needs to be done!
He is a simpleton.
Green Man
Honey wrote: Green Man wrote: Wyot wrote: Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.
Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).
Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.
So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.
Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.
No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.
I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.
But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?
Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.
Yet, women demand safe spaces we gave them that and rightly so. However it shouldn't be abused whatsoever. Don't get me started on the non- binary nonsense.
I wouldn't want my daughters to have some bloke in a skirt loitering in the changing rooms in a clothes shop. Just like any sensible woman wouldn't want to be looked at whilst getting changed.
The left have now backed themselves in a corner and have no idea what to do without offending people, however they are offending women. (ones with wombs, breasts, uterus, vaginas, menopausal or the ones who menustrate )
If Keir Starmer has no idea what a woman is then DNA testing needs to be done.
Honey
Green Man wrote: Wyot wrote: Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.
Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).
Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.
So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.
Exactly. Anybody can call themselves Sandra and that's that.
No matter what you chop off, call yourself or wear, if the good lord made you male you stay male.
I am very happy to humour people who want to "live as the opposite sex" (translated- Perform within artificial stereotypes) if life is easier for them, but not if I have to give up my rights and safety, and face a penalty for not telling lies.
But most of the aggression is coming from a small group of misogynistic men who are autogynephilic.
People can have whatever fetish thy want, but why am I forced to join in?
Part of the fetish is exposing themselves and masturbating in women's spaces, and the idea that women should accept this, and be called names if they don't pretend to like it, is absurd.
Green Man
Wyot wrote: Feminism has been defeated by the mysoginism implicit in "equalising" men as women regardless of biology. A few brave souls like Greer speak out, the rest have sold their sisters down the river.
Women can't be equalised in the same way as they are physically less strong, and generally not sexually aggressive (mind you, I have met a couple... ).
Which is the point: women are different to men, at a genetic level. To deny this is to deny women their individual validity. Try denying the individual validity (in public) of the 0.0003%, of the population of who are aggressively trans (i.e a few bone headed male aggressors in dresses) and see what happens.
So now a bloke can how have in a ladies prison. Sounds like I should of played my cards right when I had my stint inside.
Forums 
).