King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Wyot	Depp (or rather this case) should put a check on the movement in recent years towards casual condemnation of men, while at the same time clearly being an unpleasant example of a man. But if this case makes some pause and consider what actual evidence they have for allegations before making them, all to the good. As for Depp & Heard I hope they get the professional help they both evidently need.
Green Man	Jo wrote: I don't understand why the jury found that Depp had defamed Heard because his lawyer had said her claims were a hoax, when the jury found that she had defamed Depp and her claims were false. The jury in Fairfax, Virginia, found that Johnny Depp and Amber Heard both defamed each other. But it largely sided with Depp's side of the story, saying Heard had defamed her ex-husband with "false" statements about their relationship. Heard won only one of her three counter-claims against Depp, because his lawyer gave a statement to the Daily Mail in 2020 calling her abuse allegations a hoax. www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-61633236 When have juries cared ? They are they because they are forced to be.
JK2006	And Matthew Scott - good again... barristerblogger.com/2022/06/02/344
JK2006	Possibly a hoax is far worse and more damaging than a lie or a mistake? It implies it was deliberate.
Jo	I don't understand why the jury found that Depp had defamed Heard because his lawyer had said her claims were a hoax, when the jury found that she had defamed Depp and her claims were false. The jury in Fairfax, Virginia, found that Johnny Depp and Amber Heard both defamed each other. But it largely sided with Depp's side of the story, saying Heard had defamed her ex-husband with "false" statements about their relationship. Heard won only one of her three counter-claims against Depp, because his lawyer gave a statement to the Daily Mail in 2020 calling her abuse allegations a hoax. www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-61633236