King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]JK2006 wrote:[/b]
[quote]Interesting. This woman clearly believes that false allegations are “vanishingly rare”.
Does she not consider people like Carl Beech, Peter Saunders, Jemma Beale to be the tip of a vast iceberg?
Does she not think that sometimes sex crimes were NOT crimes? Even if they did take place, could it have been with the full co-operation of the “victim”? Even provoked and caused by “the victim”?
Can she not see that as morality changes, so attitudes may change?
When some things are easily seen - like pornograohy - due to communication changes, that people may be edged into considering something acceptable which is not? Or that some have different moralities to others?
I remember in the 1960s that I considered telling a girl you loved her when you didn’t, simply in order to have sex, was wrong - and could even be considered rape. Most of my friends (male and female) thought I was mad.
Times change. Morality changes. Media changes. The law changes.
These days if a parent bathes a child it can be considered abuse.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/18/serious-sexual-offenders-crimes[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: The Guardian
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author

Message

JK2006

Interesting. This woman clearly believes that false allegations are “vanishingly rare”.
Does she not consider people like Carl Beech, Peter Saunders, Jemma Beale to be the tip of a vast iceberg?
Does she not think that sometimes sex crimes were NOT crimes? Even if they did take place, could it have been with the full co-operation of the “victim”? Even provoked and caused by “the victim”?
Can she not see that as morality changes, so attitudes may change?
When some things are easily seen - like pornograohy - due to communication changes, that people may be edged into considering something acceptable which is not? Or that some have different moralities to others?
I remember in the 1960s that I considered telling a girl you loved her when you didn’t, simply in order to have sex, was wrong - and could even be considered rape. Most of my friends (male and female) thought I was mad.
Times change. Morality changes. Media changes. The law changes.
These days if a parent bathes a child it can be considered abuse.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/a...ual-offenders-crimes