cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Beyond reasonable doubt
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Taskmaster Green Man wrote:
Has a court ever been fair ??

Certainly not those that convicted the Birmingham 6 and the Guildford 4 - but, probably those held at Nuremberg in the aftermath of WWII.

Like democracy, the jury based legal system is flawed and imperfect - so many innocent people are in prison. But what's an alternative/fairer system?

People with impeccable characters though - in middle age, respected, with no records
- have a head start under our current system (like Giggs) towards freedom.
Green Man Honey wrote:
Green Man wrote:
How many on the jury are Manchester United fans ?

Presumably none. It would be unfair.


Has a court ever been fair ??
Honey Green Man wrote:
How many on the jury are Manchester United fans ?

Presumably none. It would be unfair.
Green Man How many on the jury are Manchester United fans ?
Wyot If a jury debates for hours and still can't reach majority verdicts on any counts, surely this means guilt can't be established "beyond reasonable doubt".

Gigg's should be discharged and allowed to get on with his life...

www-skysports-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s...ng-behaviour-charges