cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: NHS missing 62,000 staff
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man Wyot wrote:
As you know we don't agree on this one GM.

When I watch this all I hear is Macron saying that seeing the world in binary terms - US or China - for or against- is a mistake. He says this is two orders and we need one order.

Why do they make so much of the word "order" he uses in the video? He seems to just be saying that the world would be better off if we united rather than carried on with division.

If that is what "New World Order" means, then bring it on I say. Closer trade and Co operation has for centuries kept war at bay. Not always successfully, obviously, but in large measure.

I understand that people see European or Global governance as a threat to localised democracies, and they are. But this presupposes this is necessarily a bad thing.


Give it a couple of more years' time the Western world will be more submissive to China. We need their good, labour and trade. We will need components for electric cars and AI. Solar panels and wind turbines are manufactured from China.
Wyot As you know we don't agree on this one GM.

When I watch this all I hear is Macron saying that seeing the world in binary terms - US or China - for or against- is a mistake. He says this is two orders and we need one order.

Why do they make so much of the word "order" he uses in the video? He seems to just be saying that the world would be better off if we united rather than carried on with division.

If that is what "New World Order" means, then bring it on I say. Closer trade and Co operation has for centuries kept war at bay. Not always successfully, obviously, but in large measure.

I understand that people see European or Global governance as a threat to localised democracies, and they are. But this presupposes this is necessarily a bad thing.
Green Man Oh, for fuck's sake. `

Green Man So, Macron admits the NWO agenda.

Green Man