King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Honey wrote:[/b]
[quote]You don't think it is wrong to pay people to (illegally) silence everyone who criticises you?

Nothing wrong with making revolting false accusations against your family?

Nothing wrong in openly blackmailing them?

Nothing wrong in faking newspaper headlines?

Nothing wrong in organised and paid for "hits" (as they put it) on both The Queen and one of her aides days apart?
 
You actually believe the late Queen prevented Archie from being a prince because of his (imaginary) colour? Even though you can look at the  official documents showing that this was decided long before the Sussex's had  met each other? :dry:

Can you explain exactly HOW they have been "fighting structural racism" in the royal family, or where the evidence of any of them apart from Harry himself (several times) being racist is?

And, as you happily believe their false accusations, could you explain why Harry (in his own words) wanted to be half in and half out of his duties?

He "knew" they were racist but wanted to carry on working with the racists until they told him no!!! 
He cant have minded it very much then, can he?  :huh: Hardly FIGHTING racism, is it?  :dry:  :dry:  :dry:[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Harry'n'Meghan
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Ron	At the very least, the new Netflix episodes raise some interesting questions about how new entrants are treated by our Royal Family. We already had an inkling with the Diana saga.
Green Man	Very interesting stuff from Adrian Allen.
hedda	JK2006 wrote: It seems in the first three shows the main moan is about the media. Could they have a point? I envisage tabloid writers (Daily Mail) practically frothing at the mouth..the hatred is intense and I reckon the royal family don't give 2 hoots. so many "insiders" and their made-up quotes (Sid and Doris Boggs)
Wyot	JK2006 wrote: In the real world, they have won, hands down. In media world (and those who believe the media) it's a disaster. I think that most people understand that H & M are playing a game with the media and personally winning, but at the same time playing the victim. Doesn't go down well. I think you are assuming that most people come to dislike them only because they believe the media, rather than many seeing it for just what it is all about - and deciding that they have had enough of them....
JK2006	Oh I think they need new advisors immediately but when they unwisely decided to sue the media and even more unwisely won, they were destined to fail whatever they did. Except they haven't actually failed; they have made a fortune (good for them) and can afford total privacy apart from the few minutes of benefitting from celebrity (always useful when booking a restaurant table). In the real world, they have won, hands down. In media world (and those who believe the media) it's a disaster.