cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Absolutely superb photo in the centre of today's Guardian...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Mart Mrs Mart is an expert at Photoshop, and has said it`s genuine.
zooloo IRC the Guardian vowed not to doctor pictures after one when Gordon Brown had somebody behind him removed.

They had a very introspective debate about the use or misuse of Photoshop.

As the Guardian is the only newspaper that publicly discusses it's own errors it seems unlikely it is doctored, touched up perhaps.
Mart I don`t think it`s actually fake, but it has a remarkable touch up job done on it, failing that, the colour seperation on the printing has not done it justice.

I don`t know about anyone else, but my copy looks like someone has plonked an albatross from Photoshop on it, it even seems to have an outline!

Dodgy press pics? Whatever next....!
JK2006 A nesting albatross in a field of albatrosses.

Coleridge would have had a fit. (often did, I gather).

But does anyone else think it is a fix? Doesn't the closeup Albie look "dubbed in" like the imaginary minister in the hospital pic?

Or am I being cynical?