King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Andrew photo is a "fake"
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Wyot	I agree the photo doesn't quite look right. But surely experts could clarify this?
JK2006	I can understand the "settlement". I was offered that my original false accusers would drop their claims for £5000 each which, at the time, I could well afford. But I was brought up NEVER to pay a blackmailer (which essentially those 5 were). However, if you can afford it, people like Michael Jackson and Andrew are urged by lawyers to settle - and Andrew's £12 million was the equivalent, to us ordinary folk, to £12- all, I'm sure, paid by wealthy friends as indeed I had friends perfectly willing to do that - and these days Crowdfunding would cover such trivial amounts. The damage is done when the false allegation is made (just ask Gambo, Cliff, Tarbuck, Davidson etc). As long as media continues to love "a good story" (who doesn't?) and the law continues to support liars and blackmailers, this kind of situation will go on.
hedda	It does look odd to me..slightly off. His arm for instance around the girl must be extremely long and the hands are tanned whereas he isn't . Anyway I always believed he made a big mistake by settling as it's made not an iota of difference to how hw is crucified in the media and the Nutcase Brigade are convince Epstein ran some sort of teen call girl service for the high and mighty. www.smh.com.au/world/europe/ghislaine-ma...c45250d48f7ad904a4b3