cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Murder in Gaza and Israel
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
tdf JK2006 wrote:
The STARMER effect is interesting - not by losing him support but by exposing him as prepared to say anything that will not alienate voters - originally Jews; now Muslims.

Almost as though he has no views or principles at all, like a cypher.
tdf As someone who is usually supportive of Israel, I cannot defend their response.
JK2006 The STARMER effect is interesting - not by losing him support but by exposing him as prepared to say anything that will not alienate voters - originally Jews; now Muslims.
JK2006 There is no excuse for either side of these two terrorist groups.
No "justification". No "collateral damage".
Both sides have lots of reasons to feel upset but neither side can use these reasons for murder.
America behaved in the right way after 9/11.
Destroy Isis. Kill Bin Laden.
NOT "kill thousands of innocents". Not "hold hostages".
How can anybody justify killing small children? Whether it's cutting off their heads or bombing them to pieces - it is unforgivable.