cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Hereditary Peers
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Wyot Al Gershwin wrote:
Wyot wrote:
Yeah great we get more elected people; trying something new like that will sort all our problems out!

Amazing post. We shouldn't decide our future?



Not what I said, at all. In any way, shape or form.

But how sweet to walk around believing that if about 35% of people vote for a party 100% of people somehow *decide* the country's future.

And why do you assume there is a link between voting for someone and your wishes being implemented?

We don't live in a fairy tale.
Al Gershwin Wyot wrote:
Yeah great we get more elected people; trying something new like that will sort all our problems out!

Amazing post. We shouldn't decide our future?

Few would say hereditary peers make sense.


Lifetime peers only, perhaps - deserved ones.

There are nearly 900 peers..nonsensical
Wyot Yeah great we get more elected people; trying something new like that will sort all our problems out!
Green Man Hedda wrote:
Unelected swill

If Wyot, excelled in cricket he would of would been a Lord.
Hedda Unelected swill