King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Hugh Edwards
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Green Man	Simon wrote: If this man Edwards does not receive a custodial sentence then can you imagine the outcry when people will compare him to those jailed for simple licence non payment. Knowing this country nowadays this outcome would never surprise me. I hope I'm wrong. He has probably been into illegal porn for decades but the law finally caught up with him.
Simon	If this man Edwards does not receive a custodial sentence then can you imagine the outcry when people will compare him to those jailed for simple licence non payment. Knowing this country nowadays this outcome would never surprise me. I hope I'm wrong.
Hedda	Carl wrote: Sickening someone making indecent images of children. People's licence fees should be refunded to the amount the paedophile was paid in extortionate wages. Bbc have learned nothing from the Savile fiasco. Woke wankers organisation. As the Savile scandal appears to be hyper exaggerated by fertile minds I think you are correct..no lessons learnt.
Green Man	Carl wrote: Sickening someone making indecent images of children. People's licence fees should be refunded to the amount the paedophile was paid in extortionate wages. Bbc have learned nothing from the Savile fiasco. Woke wankers organisation. I wonder if the BBC hoped it would of blown over. If he was receiving pics from Whatapp a normal person would go to the police.
Wyot	The BBC are being attacked now for not sacking Hugh Edwards when they knew he had been arrested for child porn. They respond that they would of course have sacked him if he had been charged. I'm sorry the BBC should only have sacked him if found guilty, not just charged. It dismays me how careless people are now with due process and innocence until proven guilty.