IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Is Keir Starmer GAY? Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Carl
He's a cunt. We all know that.
Rich
JK2006 wrote: RICH - Starmer's direction to police as DPP was that they must tell complainants YOU WILL BE BELIEVED. My extension of that, as I've said since then, is simply explaining what the simple four words mean. He could have said YOU MAY BE BELIEVED. Or qualified it with "unless you are lying". Since he didn't, and kept it to four words, it clearly and essentially meant EVEN IF YOU ARE LYING.
Thankyou for clearing that up JK and I understand this now. I broadly agree there.
I think more and more people are beginning to wonder just what is making Starmer tick exactly. The correct thing to have said whould have been - You will be listened to with compassion and understanding and without judgement.
The trouble with Starmer, something that has been magnified enormously since he became PM such a short time ago, is that he is proving himself to be an enormously judgemental man against many groups in society and situations, where some can do no wrong and are above criticism and others can do no right and are permanently in his firing line. Yet his own judgement and self awareness is now proven to be poor in the extreme.
I recall reading/hearing a piece somewhere, around about the time Starmer became leader of Labour, where Paul Gambaccini was of the opinion that Keir Starmer was unfit to hold any kind of public office.
JK2006
RICH - Starmer's direction to police as DPP was that they must tell complainants YOU WILL BE BELIEVED. My extension of that, as I've said since then, is simply explaining what the simple four words mean. He could have said YOU MAY BE BELIEVED. Or qualified it with "unless you are lying". Since he didn't, and kept it to four words, it clearly and essentially meant EVEN IF YOU ARE LYING.
hedda
JK2006 wrote: Actually I don't care about any of his personal characteristics and so far he seems to have been a perfectly adequate Prime Minister. Not put a foot wrong despite the media. But I do care deeply about his time as DPP and his desire to please the media - who he thinks of as the public - or, in fact, VOTERS. Tony Blair and Boris Johnson did similar, with varying degrees of success.
But nobody before - EVER - has said "You will be believed even if you are lying". It's the same as saying "You may murder anyone you care to kill".
adequate? Not so sure about that. He is an example of the decline in British political life and how standards have deteriorated so badly.
The Tories are a basket case with now a hint of conservatism about them rather they've become venture capitalists on steroids.
Starmer has totally and blatantly lied to get where he is especially with the shocking manner in which he stabbed Corbyn in the back yet pledged to continue Corbyn's policies which gained him the leadership and then dumped those polices...despite the election numbers clearly showing Labour voters still preferred Corbyn's vision.
And he's shown he can be bought for far less than the Tories.
Boris Johnson looks incredibly clever by comparison with his freebie collection.
But Lord Alli who seems to be the hidden Labour power broker now..he's the man we need to know much more about..the organ grinder as opposed to the monkey in fine suits.
Honey
Him being gay and living apart from his wife for years is not the issue, although it does make you wonder what that tripe about him not working Fridays for the sake of his Jewish wife was about.
I dont know what the "secret" is. We already knew about the terrorist links, and him being a communist etc etc.
Whatever it is, he would be better telling us himself or clearing off.