King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Mark wrote:[/b]
[quote][b]Wyot wrote:[/b]
[quote]What I don't understand about all this is that not only is it entrapment but surely only a thought crime? They may not go through with any sexual activity. Or they may even have guessed the real age. I mean a bloody stupid thing to do full stop. But if no harm has been committed; on what basis is the punishment administered?[/quote]

I saw one where they caught a 21 year old chap in a superstore where he was meant to be meeting a 15 year old. He didn't meet the person though because they stepped as he was just ambling about the place waiting. None of the messages they'd shared were even sexual based either, just friendly chatter. In the end the biggest case they seemed to be making against him was the time and distance he'd taken to drive there. They called a police officer on him though, who simply gave him some friendly advice about being careful. Okay she was under age but it was only a six year age gap and some 15 year old girls can be as mature as 21 year old guys and appear similar age. But nothing whatsoever had actually happened other than some inoffensive chat.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Predator Entrapment 'Entertainment'
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Green Man	Matthew wrote: That fella has learnt he can make a very large amount of money out of entrapment with his monetised YT channel. Is any of this stuff is even admissable in court. Charlie Veitch comes to mind, I did find him entertaining at first but then he became an utter dick overtime. He insulted 2 strangers who were helping someone who had a fall, all Charlie could do was insult the 2 guys, there is no dignity with him. Wandering Turnip and Wendall can walk around some of the roughest areas and they do meet some rough people but they never been in altercations. Even Veitch ex girlfriend spoke about him, about bullying and he wanted her ex girlfriend's Dad to hit so he could go to the police, which is a pattern in his videos, He will stir and annoy someone they will end up being chased but he will run to the nearest copper.
Mark	Wyot wrote: What I don't understand about all this is that not only is it entrapment but surely only a thought crime? They may not go through with any sexual activity. Or they may even have guessed the real age. I mean a bloody stupid thing to do full stop. But if no harm has been committed; on what basis is the punishment administered? I saw one where they caught a 21 year old chap in a superstore where he was meant to be meeting a 15 year old. He didn't meet the person though because they stepped as he was just ambling about the place waiting. None of the messages they'd shared were even sexual based either, just friendly chatter. In the end the biggest case they seemed to be making against him was the time and distance he'd taken to drive there. They called a police officer on him though, who simply gave him some friendly advice about being careful. Okay she was under age but it was only a six year age gap and some 15 year old girls can be as mature as 21 year old guys and appear similar age. But nothing whatsoever had actually happened other than some inoffensive chat.
hedda	I've been watching some of these so-called influencers and pranksters on YT. It's amazing how so many people devoid of any talent can make a living by being so boorish.I can't imagine how ordinary their rusted on fans must be. Once again Andy Warhol was spot with his 15 minutes of fame quote.
Matthew	That fella has learnt he can make a very large amount of money out of entrapment with his monetised YT channel. Is any of this stuff is even admissable in court.
Rich	Do the ends justify the means? I've been looking at a few of these since I saw the thread. This one really annoyed me. Titled "Pred think he won a Corvette, gets busted instead". But why did he need to humiliate an innocent family into believing their brother and uncle had won Corvette car like that and drag it out, the family had done nothing wrong. They are now humiliated by the con, the discovery about the family member and have it sitting online for others enjoyment. Skeeter Jean apparently does a lot of these. youtu.be/ti3R2F106EQ?si=_lnEgXux2sc_SLlQ