IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Major Sky News article on JK Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Mike Willis
I still felt that it was still a positive piece on you and at least he did contact you regarding the consent law regarding clarification.
That was the only element where I felt it was slightly unfair. Maybe he didn't understand it.
We all have opinions on what has occured, for what it's worth, I think that JK is innocent and in 2008, he will have his convictions quashed.
Too many unsafe convictions and you can imagine the Pandora's Box it will open, when JK is acquited (apologies for spelling).
JK2006
Excuse me SE, some of us have had our heads...
That's quite enough! ED
Solihull Exile
Does look as if they're clearing the ground for an appeal sucess.
At least Sky News is close enough to admitting you'll suceed,the Sun will probally do an Ostrich,but with its head stuck between Sam Fox's....talking of which how many 16 year old girls have appeared nude in the Sun?
Tuber
good point godiver but i think it comes across pretty well - jk is clearly saying that everybody was doing it but that he didn't do it with the men convicted.
cut and dried i'd say.
lots of very red faces for 08!
Al
Yes, I read your words twice before I knew what you meant. You admit to breaking the laws re- age of consent which, at the time, was 21. The meaning is confused by other comments about some pop stars sleeping with 14 yr olds, and you do use the word "we". I think most people will read what they want, or expect, it to mean.
Interestingly, when I wrote my piece on the "revolting unsigned", a friend advised me to not include the bit where I mention that you'd been number one in the Fab Chart. "It'll never be widely accepted," he said. "I'm just reporting a fact," I replied. Plus, it helped to make a valid point about new freedoms in the music market.