cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Anonymity
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Rich JK2006 wrote:
Strikes me that the Chinese businessman accused by the media and Government would NOT want his anonymity lifted if he was guilty. People normally want anonymity when they know they are liable to be exposed as crooks or spies or fundamentally dishonest. And Judges are aware of this. Watch this tale develop.

Double bluff. They want you to believe that.
Al Gershwin This is a can of worms! Initial indications are that this chap was meeting government/royalty - for a considerable length of time.

Including Prime Ministers; did MI5/6 not vet him first? Andy again gets the blame (for not vetting Epstein)! But it seems decidedly unfair.
JK2006 Strikes me that the Chinese businessman accused by the media and Government would NOT want his anonymity lifted if he was guilty. People normally want anonymity when they know they are liable to be exposed as crooks or spies or fundamentally dishonest. And Judges are aware of this. Watch this tale develop.