IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: Anonymity Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Rich
JK2006 wrote: Strikes me that the Chinese businessman accused by the media and Government would NOT want his anonymity lifted if he was guilty. People normally want anonymity when they know they are liable to be exposed as crooks or spies or fundamentally dishonest. And Judges are aware of this. Watch this tale develop.
Double bluff. They want you to believe that.
Al Gershwin
This is a can of worms! Initial indications are that this chap was meeting government/royalty - for a considerable length of time.
Including Prime Ministers; did MI5/6 not vet him first? Andy again gets the blame (for not vetting Epstein)! But it seems decidedly unfair.
JK2006
Strikes me that the Chinese businessman accused by the media and Government would NOT want his anonymity lifted if he was guilty. People normally want anonymity when they know they are liable to be exposed as crooks or spies or fundamentally dishonest. And Judges are aware of this. Watch this tale develop.