cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Lucy Letby
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Everyone is entitled to an opinion but I think it should be an informed opinion. I have no idea of her (or most others') innocence or guilt. I just know the system is broken and most people find it easier to believe whatever media tells them.
Green Man I think she is guilty. ITV thought Harold Shipman was worth their time for World In Action. He was starting his killing spree when this was filmed and aired.

Rich Downing Street Cat wrote:
I have to say I'm more with Rich on this. I don't know enough about this case to comment much. But people seem obsessed with it. Just a very good job Letby doesn't look like Harold Shipman. I doubt anyone would be on her side.


PRECISELY THIS!
Dai If you have been read the very long and detailed New Yorker article that was the first to question the reliability of Lucy Letby's conviction (mainly because of the very strict reporting restrictions here in the uk) and the special reports by MD (Dr Phil Hammond) in Private Eye which have subjected the evidence used to convict Lucy Letby to a very detailed and thorough analysis over the last couple of months you might very well be questioning the validity of her conviction yourself! MD has stated that he does not 'know' whether Lucy Letby is innocent. In fact after the guilty verdict was served he accepted the verdict of the court as did many others. Subsequently he was contacted by a number of experts in their particular field,who believe that the statistics and science used to convict Letby was incomplete and flawed. While MD has stated that he does not know whether Lucy Letby is innocent or not,it is pretty obvious from his ongoing analysis of the evidence and various communications exchanged between him and various experts and people qualified in neonatal care over the last couple of months which trajectory his line of opinion is moving in! I suggest reading the New Yorker article which can be found on the internet,although you probably won't find it at the New Yorker,but it can be found! Just put 'New Yorker article Lucy Letby' into the search engine. MD's reports in Private Eye can be downloaded from their website as pdf's for free. You don't have to subscribe or be a subscriber! (So you won't have to end up cancelling your subscription!) Read those first....then after you have digested it all,decide whether you still think Lucy Letby is guilty (or not!) Great website by the way JK!
Downing Street Cat I have to say I'm more with Rich on this. I don't know enough about this case to comment much. But people seem obsessed with it. Just a very good job Letby doesn't look like Harold Shipman. I doubt anyone would be on her side.