cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Judges on TV
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Rich The judiciary should not be classed as entertainment.
hedda It's the judiciary caving in to a rapacious media thirsting for sensation and who have absolutely no problem vilifying judges who may incur their wrath.
Downing Street Cat I am at odds as to whether it's a good or bad thing? It appears that the only televised court judgements which include sentencing are the ones that that the media find satisfyingly sensational or salacious enough. I'm not certain how anyone can in any way benefit from this. What if it later transpires that it's a miscarriage of justice? Maybe a televised judgement might help, or maybe just convince the stupid people that they must be guilty. Men in Wigs Channel is inevitable. Necessary or just puerile entertainment and a lust for vengeance on behalf of the viewer?
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk