IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Riots
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
Rich wrote:
The most disadvantaged children are white working class boys at the moment, and many have a crisis of confidence.
Infact Starmer leads a party that was made on the backs of the white working class and for them, yet he gives every impression of actually detesting everything they stand for and appears to have proven it. Whatever this odious Labour party is now for, it's not for the white working class of Britain and their future prospects, yet they are the backbone of this nation.
You bring up an excellent point.
Starmer cruised in on a once great party that was built over decades by working people and the disadvantaged. He blatantly lied to the parrty members that he would accept and promote the plans that nearly brought a win for Corbyn.
At present all he's done is attack those very same working people. |
|
Wyot |
Jo wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]Jo wrote:
It does sound like it, but perhaps they feel the need to reiterate these objectives, in case other parties wouldn't, for example, include a focus on disadvantaged children or those with special educational needs and disabilities.
I suppose so Jo. But don't we already focus on disadvantaged children and Special Ed Needs? What do these words actually mean? What does the "focus" consist of? And why the assumption that within broadly the same educational budget and structure as ever, that anything more can be done? |
|
Rich |
The most disadvantaged children are white working class boys at the moment, and many have a crisis of confidence.
Infact Starmer leads a party that was made on the backs of the white working class and for them, yet he gives every impression of actually detesting everything they stand for and appears to have proven it. Whatever this odious Labour party is now for, it's not for the white working class of Britain and their future prospects, yet they are the backbone of this nation. |
|
Green Man |
I agree that some children should be taken away if the parents can't cope or the child has problems, the government needs to get their own house in order also. When the extra 5 million in the next few years come to the UK, there's going to be a lot of kids falling through the cracks.
ONS only give out the recorded stats.
uk.news.yahoo.com/net-migration-drive-uk...ation-094101092.html |
|
Jo |
Wyot wrote:
Jo wrote:
This seems to be the Plan for Change, with "break down the barriers to opportunity" and "giving children the best start in life" being the heading and subheading of one of the chapters.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6.../Plan_for_Change.pdf
A stimulating read indeed:
"Help every child to achieve and thrive at school, through excellent teaching and high standards. This will include a focus on disadvantaged children and those with special educational needs and disabilities. Impact will be measured through attainment at the end of secondary school."
Every child: good to know they won't be leaving any out of the plan which will be achieved by teaching effectively. Then measured through tests at the end of school...
This is just a description of the current teaching process, not a bloody "plan".
It does sound like it, but perhaps they feel the need to reiterate these objectives, in case other parties wouldn't, for example, include a focus on disadvantaged children or those with special educational needs and disabilities. For instance, Reform UK's "Our contract with you" doesn't mention these children, or even the need for excellent teaching and high standards, in its page on education (electronic page 13, document page 11).
assets.nationbuilder.com/reformuk/pages/...h_You.pdf?1718625371 |
|
|
|
|
