cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: And why Not?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Downing Street ouisCat Rich wrote:
No sequel DSC? But it came out in Nineteen ET2.😄
Rich No sequel DSC? But it came out in Nineteen ET2.
Wyot ET went home so there is no chance of contacting him about a sequel...what are people like....
Downing Street Cat Always surprised there was never an ET 2. Been sequels of nearly every blockbuster I can think of. Most 2's are dreadful as they rarely have the same production values of the first film. Jaws 2 wasn't bad to be fair. Exorcist 2 was diabolical. Godfather 2 was good. But mostly I don't appreciate franchises. LOTR are overly long and you really to do have to be in the mood, likewise the novels. Never been a Star Wars fan, and was never ever that keen on Indiana Jones-essentially Bond without the charm and with a whip. Superman 2 was excellent to be fair. It was actually better than 1.Still perplexed as to why they haven't done a big production of Dr Who. The Cushing films were lame.
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk