cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Question for Humanity?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man Downing Street Cat wrote:
Evil depends on silence
It thrives on support. It can only be defeated by noise, bluster and forceful opposition.


You know, fighting a forest fire with fire is the best way as, there is no oxygen. It's called an indirect attack.
Green Man BaseCamp wrote:
Who bears moral responsibility?

Psychos deliberately letting foxes into an unguarded chicken run?

Or, foxes doing what foxes are known to do in unguarded chicken runs?


Psychos letting foxes in an unguarded chicken run. I would say at least around 95% of chicken runs are fox-proof, unless the owner leaves them open by accident or they are damaged and not repaired. There's a reaction to every action.

People just suck in general to be honest.
Downing Street Cat Evil depends on silence
It thrives on support. It can only be defeated by noise, bluster and forceful opposition.
BaseCamp Who bears moral responsibility?

Psychos deliberately letting foxes into an unguarded chicken run?

Or, foxes doing what foxes are known to do in unguarded chicken runs?