cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: A tiny, grudging snippet in the Mail
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Downing Street Cat Wyot wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:
Seems Greg Wallace is back in the news. Now sacked by the BBC over 50 more complaints. That's a very round figure. Maybe he told 50 more rude jokes with the words 'bum' and 'cock' in the punch line,.

Well the more serious allegations involve him - unbidden - putting his hand up women's skirts and rubbing their private parts.


I really don't believe he would do that. I may be wrong, but always strikes me as odd when they all come climbing out of the closet with serious accusations so much later. And now apparently he's been told by a barrister not to say 'Women are making it all up.' What? Even if they have been making it up? Jaysus.
Wyot Downing Street Cat wrote:
Seems Greg Wallace is back in the news. Now sacked by the BBC over 50 more complaints. That's a very round figure. Maybe he told 50 more rude jokes with the words 'bum' and 'cock' in the punch line,.

Well the more serious allegations involve him - unbidden - putting his hand up women's skirts and rubbing their private parts. Behaviour, if true, that would certainly merit Police involvement and dismissal in my view.

However, I would not see him cancelled. I loathe that pitiless, heartless cultural development.
hedda Jo wrote:
Last sentence in that article:

This story originally appeared on The Sun and is republished here with permission.
Telegraph:

Why FBI dropping Epstein case is bad news for Prince Andrew

"US authorities’ decision removes threat hanging over the Duke of York – but also means he has lost chance to clear his name"

Wonder why the Mail hasn't covered it, unless they're now disciples of Saint Virginia.


The website is a Murdoch entity & often carries tales from The Sun.

None of this is dousing the conspiracy mob who do actually point out some interesting flaws.

Such as: the FBI have always claimed there was no vision of Epstein's cell as the cameras had broken down. That was the official story yet now..we have vision!

Another clever soul watched the entire video and points out the time clock jumps just over a minute towards the end. Missing footage.

And the claims of activist James O'Keefe who secretly filmed US AG Pam Bondi saying there were 1000s of Epstein videos the FBI was laboriously going through one by one to identify children.

Surely this news also dents Guiffe's claims?

All very mysterious and I don't think this is the end of the matter.
Downing Street Cat Seems Greg Wallace is back in the news. Now sacked by the BBC over 50 more complaints. That's a very round figure. Maybe he told 50 more rude jokes with the words 'bum' and 'cock' in the punch line,.
JK2006 The media HATES revealing a great story was a lie.
The Times even manages to make a conspiracy out of its coverage.

www.thetimes.com/article/677b5334-e5da-4...87d4653d19c54ea6b2b5