King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Diane Abbott
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Green Man	hedda wrote: Wyot wrote: She did state a fact I agree and Starmer is a reactive wimp. But why she repeatedly feels the need to say the particular racism she might experience is more likely to occur than that experienced by other groups is strange. It is obviously true so why keep saying it? She isn't just saying the words in a vacum; she is trying to establish a hierarchy of victimhood. With her at the top. I think she really only said it once in an interview ages ago and in this recent occasion she was asked about the previous interview so responded. Decades ago when I was young (and gorgeous) with blonde hair & blue eyes and attended an event at the Hammersmith Odeon with my Irish wife who had blonde hair & green eyes & we were accompanied by our New Zealand friend who also had blonde hair, a very famous comedian walked past and quipped.."Hitler would have loved those three" With a Jewish mother I don't think he would have loved me so much. Appearances can be deceptive. Nothing wrong with dark humour. If I was there and heard that joke, I would have burst out laughing.
hedda	Wyot wrote: She did state a fact I agree and Starmer is a reactive wimp. But why she repeatedly feels the need to say the particular racism she might experience is more likely to occur than that experienced by other groups is strange. It is obviously true so why keep saying it? She isn't just saying the words in a vacum; she is trying to establish a hierarchy of victimhood. With her at the top. I think she really only said it once in an interview ages ago and in this recent occasion she was asked about the previous interview so responded. Decades ago when I was young (and gorgeous) with blonde hair & blue eyes and attended an event at the Hammersmith Odeon with my Irish wife who had blonde hair & green eyes & we were accompanied by our New Zealand friend who also had blonde hair, a very famous comedian walked past and quipped.."Hitler would have loved those three" With a Jewish mother I don't think he would have loved me so much. Appearances can be deceptive.
Wyot	She did state a fact I agree and Starmer is a reactive wimp. But why she repeatedly feels the need to say the particular racism she might experience is more likely to occur than that experienced by other groups is strange. It is obviously true so why keep saying it? She isn't just saying the words in a vacum; she is trying to establish a hierarchy of victimhood. With her at the top.
Jo	Whenever I've heard Diane Abbott speaking, she has always seemed reasonable to me and to talk sense. I seem to remember that after Margaret Thatcher died, she gave a very measured speech in the HoC, not uncritical but respectful. By contrast, Glenda Jackson put the boot in and seemed a bit undignified.
hedda	Abbott stated the bleeding obvious. The Zionist lobby cannot bear the fact they aren't always the main characters. Starmer supports Genocide. I loathe him far more than I did Thatcher. The current Labour Party faces annihilation if Corbyn's proposed party gets up although I doubt it would win an election. Of course..4 bloody years is such a long time to wait especially under Harold Wilson's mantra that 7 days is a long time in politics.