King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Mother with baby arrested for having an opinion
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Green Man	Honey wrote: hedda wrote: Of for fucks sake "there is no-one more persecuted than me" LOL What a ghastly dingbat which of course is not a crime (sadly). She was clearly disturbing the peace and harassing people which is a crime but just a move on order may have been more appropriate. Mind you that voice alone should be illegal. There was no need for her to mention it, but she is right about the open racism towards gypsy people. There was no need for those people to call her racist either. It seems the modern equivalent of when we used to shout "Poo-Head in the playground. Ditto. Being dubbed racist is just an empty word these days, it's overused to shut people down you don't agree with. Remeber the days when people just had opinions?
Honey	hedda wrote: Of for fucks sake "there is no-one more persecuted than me" LOL What a ghastly dingbat which of course is not a crime (sadly). She was clearly disturbing the peace and harassing people which is a crime but just a move on order may have been more appropriate. Mind you that voice alone should be illegal. There was no need for her to mention it, but she is right about the open racism towards gypsy people. There was no need for those people to call her racist either. It seems the modern equivalent of when we used to shout "Poo-Head in the playground.
Wyot	Watching this what amazes me is the number of people who continue to try and engage with this woman. Don't they understand she is not listening to them and has no desire to; she is just preparing to shout her next line? Why do they bother... (Bit like PMQs...)
Green Man	Downing Street Cat wrote: Green Man wrote: Downing Street Cat wrote: I don't see a woman being intimidated. I see a woman looking for a scrap. If she wanted to scrap, she would have done it. Women normally just lash out without caution when they want to, not wait around. The police are in the wrong, and so are you this time, Cat. Well GM, yes. She has every right to hate people protesting about starving children in Gaza. Bless her. So awfully inconvenienced. Not a cunt at all. When did she mention Gaza? Cat, I tell you what, go on a fitness regime and fight for what you believe in.
Downing Street Cat	Green Man wrote: Downing Street Cat wrote: I don't see a woman being intimidated. I see a woman looking for a scrap. If she wanted to scrap, she would have done it. Women normally just lash out without caution when they want to, not wait around. The police are in the wrong, and so are you this time, Cat. Well GM, yes. She has every right to hate people protesting about starving children in Gaza. Bless her. So awfully inconvenienced. Not a cunt at all.