cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: This is why most bystanders don't help
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Green Man Honey wrote:
Downing Street Cat wrote:
'Put your cock away you fool' would have been quite sufficient. Not certain a beating was the required response.

The man who first approached him told him "Mate, pull your trousers up, you need to get off the train" repeatedly.

Witnesses say he was about to crap on the floor.

If people stand around and let that happen, I would say they are more loony than the chap without pants!


Stop talking sense, Honey, you are going against the narrative. You could get locked up.
Honey Downing Street Cat wrote:
'Put your cock away you fool' would have been quite sufficient. Not certain a beating was the required response.

The man who first approached him told him "Mate, pull your trousers up, you need to get off the train" repeatedly.

Witnesses say he was about to crap on the floor.

If people stand around and let that happen, I would say they are more loony than the chap without pants!
Wyot Rich wrote:


Wyot, in a library I was in someone once got taken to task by someone else for loudly blurting out the "F" word. The person who took offence and called them out for swearing actually used a further three "F" words to castigate them, spectacularly losing the moral high ground and clearly had no self awareness of their own.


When we are putting ourselves on the moral high ground any behaviour can be justified Rich!

The same principle applies to your library swearer right up to Netanyahu now...
Green Man Wyot wrote:
Green Man wrote:
Wyot wrote:
People outraged at him exposing himself near children decide to expose the children to them beating the crap out of him...

Children just love to see random violence; really settles them down...

I hope the thugs are caught and prosecuted.


We call it Fuck around and find out.


I call it self righteous self indulgence not giving a fuck about the harm it causes to the watching children...


A punch up does not affect children but perverts do.
Green Man Rich wrote:
I remember the Daily Mail making an article in one of the previous heatwaves we had about the number of men going on public transport with their shirts off, with accompanying pictures, almost trying to equate that with some kind of indecency which it is not and never has been. There were a handful of sneakily taken photos of these perfectly law abiding men going about their daily business on a hot day in shorts and bare chests.

One look at the Mail website down the right hand side and every other image seems to be a man or woman with not much on snapped by some paparazzi on a beach somewhere with comment about their bodies.

Wyot, in a library I was in someone once got taken to task by someone else for loudly blurting out the "F" word. The person who took offence and called them out for swearing actually used a further three "F" words to castigate them, spectacularly losing the moral high ground and clearly had no self awareness of their own.


It was a fad that started in NYC.