IMPORTANT NOTE
:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Username
Password
Remember me
Lost Password?
No account yet?
Register
Home
Forums
Messageboards
Categories
Show latest posts
Welcome,
Guest
Please
Login
or
Register
.
Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name
:
Subject
:
Boardcode
:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Very Big
URL:
Text:
Size:
URL:
Size:
Width:
Height:
Provider:
AnimeEpisodes
Biku
Bofunk
Break
Clip.vn
Clipfish
Clipshack
Collegehumor
Current
DailyMotion
DivX
DownloadFestival
Flash
FlashVars
Fliptrack
Fliqz
Gametrailers
Gamevideos
Glumbert
GMX
Google
GooglyFoogly
iFilm
Jumpcut
Kewego
LiveLeak
LiveVideo
MediaPlayer
MegaVideo
Metacafe
Mofile
Multiply
MySpace
MyVideo
QuickTime
Quxiu
RealPlayer
Revver
RuTube
Sapo
Sevenload
Sharkle
Spikedhumor
Stickam
Streetfire
StupidVideos
Toufee
Tudou
Unf-Unf
Uume
Veoh
VideoclipsDump
Videojug
VideoTube
Vidiac
VidiLife
Vimeo
WangYou
WEB.DE
Wideo.fr
YouKu
YouTube
ID:
URL:
Message
:
(+)
/
(-)
Emoticons
More Smilies
[b]In The Know wrote:[/b] [quote][b]zooloo wrote:[/b] [quote] Where is your evidence Blair was lying on this occasion?[/quote] B-Liar is using "The Nuremburg Defence" (it wasn't me, gov - I didn't know anything about it - honest !) ... it didn't work for them - and it shouldn't work for him. He either LIED on the first occasion (by denying knowing of the existence of, and our co-operation with the CIA secret prisons and their inherent torture and abuse) OR he was completely incompentent (and culpable - by not checking) by allowing UK troops to become War Criminals by co-operating with these prisons (which he knew nothing about !) So ... [b]do we CONVICT for KNOWING ... or CONVICT for NOT KNOWING ?[/b] btw - you STILL haven't found 12 people who would find him innocent, have you??!!![/quote]
Preview
:
Enter code here
Topic History of:
B-Liar caught lying AGAIN !
Max. showing the last 5 posts -
(Last post first)
Author
Message
JK2006
OK that's quite enough on this thread which I now declare closed!
zooloo
In The Know wrote:
Yep - guilty as hell !
This is what is called plausible deniability. The UK government has been operating a policy of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil".
but ....
GUILTY AS HELL !
The question is quite simple - do you have evidence that Blair was lying on this occasion - Yes or No?
In The Know
Yep - guilty as hell !
This is what is called plausible deniability. The UK government has been operating a policy of "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil".
but ....
GUILTY AS HELL !
zooloo
BTW you have the Nuremberg Defence incorrect. (Which by your own measure this is the third proof you are lying)
zooloo
You keep shifting your terms of reference and going off at tangents.
The question is quite simple - do you have evidence that Blair was lying on this occasion - Yes or No?
Board Categories
King of Hits
Tipsheet
... Tipsheet Messageboard
Powered by
Kunena