King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Diana Inquest - don't forget that .....
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
In The Know	veritas wrote: I don't know what happened to Diana and Dodi but if the British establishment ( whoever they are) want to get rid of you they do. Too much time at the inquest was spent talking to people like Burrell - who was not even in Paris. All his evidence was, was rumour and gossip from previous years.
veritas	I don't know what happened to Diana and Dodi but if the British establishment ( whoever they are) want to get rid of you they do. I knew Charles first butler who Diana had fired when they got married and he sold his story in the USA for big bucks and was the first to really sell his story. But he always said it was the biggest mistake crossing the most powerful family on the planet (or more importantly -those around them). He got hassled everytime he travelled anywhere in the world and they made his life a misery. He finally died of cancer. Tony Benn has always said the "establishment" would do away with the Royal Family if it suited their purposes. I guess that's why Prince Phillip always says "don't shoot us-we can be packed and gone in half an hour"
zooloo	victor wrote: I think we should have another inquest. I think we need an inquest into the inquest! The fact not all of the jury agreed, we should assume they believe Diana was killed by MI6, proves she was murdered! If the inquest was 100% in agreement with anything other than "It woz MI6 wot dun it" that proves it was fixed! We should hold perpetual inquiries until the right verdict (One ITK and Al Fayed agree with) is reached! WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
In The Know	Mike Willis wrote: 25% is a lot of doubters. Especially as they were the ones who DID sift the "evidence" ! Most of the main theories seem to have been "glossed over" imo - for example, whether MI6 was involved seemed to consisent entirely of asking one of their people whether they had murdered Diana - and then simply accepting their denial ! Did anyone expect them to admit it??!! Although I've not read everything factors such as the embalming of the body (actually illegal under French law until an inquest has taken place) seem to have also been glossed over. Why was this done - and on whose orders? What was being covered up? As was "why she was taken to the furthest hospital" rather than 2 closer ones, and also why the ambulance parked in a side street for some time. All in all, I think this will go down as another Hutton Inquiry - an inquiry designed NOT to find the truth !
Mike Willis	That's the fair point on all counts, although in the case of the princes concert, it was the 10th anniversary of her death. However, you are probably right about them using their names in other instants. I am surprised that the Sun (which was bought by one of my colleagues) only contains three pages of it. 25% is a lot of doubters.