cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Victim Impact statements
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 And can you imagine the "impact" on all those family and friends of Sally Clark when she murdered her babies?

Only problem was - she didn't.

I reckon the impact on individuals stitched up by police and CPS (like me) must be immense.
Denise I agree. Several high profile murder convictions have been found to be wrong. E.g. the 'victims' of Stefan Kisko turned out to not be his victims. He was innocent of the crime.
JK2006 Watching that sad case in America and having no idea whether the Brit is guilty or innocent (the verdict has no relevance whatever; my lack of actual information and knowledge is what counts)... I really hate these "victim impact" statements.

Often they are not the impact on direct victims at all (the victim being dead) and the awful impact every tragedy has is very dangerous when delivered as a sentencing tool (what about the victims who are friends and family of the perpetrator? This could - and should once you cross the line - go on forever)...

Often they are designed in order to get greater vengeance, sympathy, media coverage...

Draw the line and ban the lot - sentence on the facts (if you can get them).