King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Conspiracy Files - BBC2 tonight - 9pm
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Pete Clarke	Yes, they did...
Angel	Did you see the programme?? Obviously not!
steveimp	Didn't the BBC report that WTC7 had collapsed, when it was still standing behind the reporter telling us this 25 minutes before?
In The Know	I still think the very idea that untrained (or only partially trained) people could hijack airliners and fly them perfectly to their destinations is quite absurd !
BR	Do you actually believe that radar only shows up "transponders" ? This would mean that as long as a terrorist turned off a transponder then they could fly where they want when they want LOL which is not true. A transponder only gives out the plane code. The plane is still visible and on radar when the hijack took place the air traffic control can trace back the plane to where the transponder was turned off in order to get a fix. It only disappears off the radar once the plane either explodes or goes under the height of the radar. I hope that puts to bed another myth which you have taken on board from the misinformation which is spread around to explain WHY the USA did not shoot down these planes. The actual planes scrambled went OUT TO SEA to meet the threat !! Which is even funnier when they knew it was a threat from an internal flight hijack LOL Can you explain that ( I know it is because the traditional view was that a threat to the USA would come from "outside" but in this case the planes were scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes - yet this was an internal flight(s) Still more questions to be answered - and yes I agree that we have been bombarded by appalling images from 9/11 - and it has been done to death by the media ( In order to brainwash us I believe into switching off - otherwise why do it !! ) but I think that now we are 7 years on from it then we need to look at what happened with the benefit of hindsight and the evidence which has come out. History takes time to "settle" and this is what is happening - dont knock it - it is worth watching on I PLAYER. What is most interesting is the one side ( official version ) say everything they say is 100% true without any evidence necessarily for this ) yet the other side are really only saying that the truth as presented is not 100% true and so are asking for it to be looked into. If the OFFICIAL version has "NOTHING TO HIDE" then why are they so admamant and so against investigation and seem to have covered up the steel of this building etc.