cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: actress Judy Davis wins libel case
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Denise I'm not familiar with Judy Davis but anyone who can rattle Murdoch's empire has my support.
veritas Another blow for Rupert Murdoch's News Ltd :

Judy Davis was awarded $150,000 in damages including interest over defamatory newspaper articles, in a Supreme Court judgement today that took into account her continuing hurt and anguish.

Justice Peter McClellan ordered Nationwide News to pay the two-time Oscar nominee $150,736 plus her legal costs for publishing articles in The Daily Telegraph and its sister newspapers in Perth and Queensland which implied she had behaved in an "unreasonable and selfish" way in opposing a development in Birchgrove.

The newspapers reported that Davis had lobbied against a proposal to upgrade lighting at Birchgrove Oval to make the area safer for children, in articles a jury later found implied she was "heartless" and "indifferent to the risk of injury to hundreds of young children".


www.smh.com.au/news/national/judy-davis-...2/1220857797110.html
******************************
Although these sort of cases can really only be taken on by the rich-as in the Max Mosley privacy win against the News of The World-they are setting precendents.

More proof that the tabloids may have to start thinking differently about the casual way in which they spout off about people without a thought of the hurt they cause.

Perhaps lawyers may start to take cases on a no-win no-pay basis as is common in the US once they feel they can convincingly win.