Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: KAKA
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Al |
Personally I like challenges. It's too much of an easy ride to join a team that's already at the top. Much more interesting and fun to join a lower team and try help them get to the top. Also more rewarding when it happens. |
|
robbiex |
£250,000 per week, is was more like £600,000 per week. I think the main reason why Kaka didn't go to Man City is because there is very little chance of winning trophies in the next few years with City. Also the money would be little incentive, I mean he is already mega-rich, how much money do you need? and when you spend it it doesn't give you what you expect. |
|
Al |
Mark Lawrenson was right. He said that the fact Kaka played at the weekend suggested that he wasn't planning on moving. Why risk injury to a £100m player just before you sell him?
Alan Shearer said that the fact that Kaka did not swap shirts but collected the match ball suggested that he was probably moving and keeping them as memories of his last game for the club.
City were given permission to talk to the player, but apparently Kaka had no intention of moving.
I do agree with Mark Lawrenson that, at a time when most City fans were struggling to pay the bills and worried about losing their homes, it would send out wrong signals to pay one player £250,000 per week |
|
I'm Not A Celebrity |
Indeed! He's not coming. It was all a load of old kak-a! |
|
JK2006 |
Who's running the world?
The meeejah! |
|
|
|
