King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Michael Jackson's death shows how deep beliefs can be
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
BR	and to prove how the POLICE and STATE encourage this sort of "action " this story is a classic example of false allegations.... www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196362...-night-ex-lover.html False allegations are now EPIDEMIC. I would envisage that probably 75% of teachers have had at least one allegation against them - rich stars probably have a 100% record against them. It is out of control.
BR	If you look at all major stars of sport and entertainment - Ronaldo has had a rape case against him - Van Persie as well - The Stones have had some cases against them - The Who......need I go on. Loads of celebs get this sort of attention. The "non story" is the hardest to argue against - so people like Dave Jones or JK go to court possibly not even knowing who is accusing them - and so how the hell do they defend against something that has not happened !! it is totally impossible. I was told by a Lawyer that an allegation with no substance is often easier to prosecute because it becomes "your word against theirs" and then the argument is not about whether anything happened but about "credibility" of the accuser or the accused. It basically becomes a lottery. With the media sensationalising everything these days even if a Celeb wins the case based on evidence ( as MJ did ) he is still a pariah and these allegations are being dredged up hour after hour after hour. He cant escape them. The FALSE ACCUSER has won - they win because it is easier to destroy than create. Michael Jackson was innocent. I dont believe he was perfect but I believe that he was innocent. Every celeb must live in fear of such allegations. You only have to see Mohammed Al Fayed's recent experience to see it is not only young people who have these problems and those in entertainment - but well known business people as well. It does seem likely that "The state" sponsors MUCH of this allegation business - not least with their "compensation" system which PAYS OUT for allegations - you dont even need to prove anything.
JK2006	Observation, Mike, and a certainty that the false accusers need a hook to hang it on; remember there was not a single complaint about me to anyone, police, newspapers or direct, in 56 years until the story broke and suddenly a lot of people saw cash.
mikemacca	JK2006 wrote: Fortunately there aren't as many criminals as we are told How can you possibly know that ?
veritas	I think you are correct and that comes from J.Randy Taroborelli who had better access to Jackson than any other writer. There is also the very insidious system in the USA of the accused pleading guilty to a lesser crime in a re-arranged deal. It's meant to be an incentive for a guilty person to get a greatly reduced sentence and prevent massive court costs on both sides. Instead it's routinely abused by DAs to secure convictions. There is a famous recent case involving the actor Paul Reubens who plead guilty to a misedemnour when charged with posessing 'child porn'-over his collection of erotic art that many celebrities said they had seen-putting them in risk of a charge as well. Reubens was convicted of the misdemenour yet still retains his art collection. Weird or what ? And as Jackson seemed to have no concept of money..what was $20M as a pay-off when it would have cost that much to defend himself anyway ? Plus the bizarre notion that if a person accepted a pay-off after supposedly being abused..where was the "crime" ?. Odd how money soothes any ruffled feathers and even expunges the terrible 'suffering' of an bused person. With hindsight he would maybe have been better going through that trial-if you read all you can about it I have no doubt he would have been found not guilty and the second more damaging one may have never happened.