King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]BR wrote:[/b]
[quote]No UK paper would air such views.

If I told you that I met the 21.7 bomber the NIGHT BEFORE he bombed London and CALLED THE POLICE To tell them about him and that I was worried about him - yet all they did was tell me they would look into it !!!!
would you believe me ?

IT IS TRUE - My car broke down in North Southgate with both of us in the car - by the flats where the bombings were masterminded from.  The fat bomber came up to my car CRYING and trying to talk to us.  I not only had rung the RAC but then rang the Police ( which as you can imagine is not something I do lightly ) but that is how worried about the bloke I was.......

Then he got on a bus - the Police called and said they would alert the bus garages.

The next time I saw him he was a photo in the papers and yes I rang the Police to remind them of what had happened........

Never heard a thing back.

Something is not right at all about all of this.

Just because you dont read it in the media does not mean that it has not happened.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Did 7/7 Police Cover Up their own assassinations ?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
BR	www.scribd.com/doc/7889687/The-July-7th-London-Bombings A research paper into the 7.7 Bombings with FACTS. I suggest that anyone wanting to look into this starts with this paper. It has factual information and points up the main problems with the Official Story. What I want to know is this : Mike Macca says the 4 men ( But not the big black bloke who was actually one of the four ) were filmed at a THEME PARK. But BIZARRELY on 7 JULY there is NOT ONE CCTV set of footage of any of the 4 bombers actually in LONDON !! In fact the nearest we get is a grainy undated photo of them supposedly arriving at LUTON STATION. So we are EXPECTED TO BELIEVE 4 men got on the most watched transport system in the WORLD at LUTON and travelled to LONDON ( where there are THOUSANDS of CCTV cameras ) and wandered around and got on trains and buses WITHOUT A SINGLE PIECE OF CCTV evidence to collaborate this story...... Cough - sorry but they are having a GIRAFFE. No CCTV of them getting on the train that they bombed = no bomb on that train planted by these people. Finally : Can anyone explain how the witnesses believe the bombs were planted UNDER the trains and that the forensics claim the xplosives were military grade stuff - not home made BATH bombs. I think we now have THREE POLICE COVER UPS 1. DE MENEZES 2. G20 IAN TOMLINSON 3. 7.7 and the 7.7 Official Story is unravelling fast as it is examined. At some point we should see a witness come forward about the CANARY WHARF killings / incidents. This is a POSSIBLE main clue to what happened to the 4 men after they went to LUTON. They got on a bus at Kings Cross and went to Canary Wharf....but still WHY is one of them on a bus that is going that way which gets DIRECTED into TAVISTOCK SQUARE - why did he not travel with the other 3 ? Too many questions to prove anything at all - but the one thing is for sure - the lack of CCTV proof for the men being in LONDON on that day shows a major problem with the official story. Remember - the media "repeats" stories without ever giving any proof. They have talking experts to back their story up. But never any hard first hand evidence.....yet the public are so brainwashed that we read this stuff and make up our mind NOT ON EVIDENCE but on probability based on our own view ( which has already been prepared by the media with ALERTS and FEAR BULLETINS saying - A terror attack is expected etc etc. ) It is so easy for the media and NWO - it is like giving candy to children. We believe 90% of what they say - and even when we challenge what they say we have nothing to put in its place because they hold all the evidence in their hands. Great stuff !!! Genius.
BR	I suggest you read this : discardedlies.com/entry/?4059 What could have caused this "rush" ? Official Stories are rubbish - I take it you believed that DE MENEZES ran away from the POLICE - vaulted the tube gates and was wearing a bulky jacket ( All in the OFFICIAL STORY until disproved ) I take it you believed that TOMLINSON had no contact with the POLICE at all before his death ( Official STORY until disproved ) We are living sadly in an era of POLICE LIES and GOVERNMENT COVER UPS. Even those who have very little understanding of events can see this from what has been happening. 7.7 Official Story is wrong. It is wrong on many counts. What happened really ? I dont know yet but like with DE MENEZES and TOMLINSON the truth is now leaking out bit by bit.
mikemacca	BR wrote: Which bit of what I have written do you not believe ? Everything that I said in my post has been in the public domain and proved. OK public domain and proved..... There is footage of the 4 together at a theme park and then as a massive coincidence they happened to be on the 4 vehicles that were blown up ? Yet you would have it that they did not socialise together. Mohammad Sidique Khan, The Edgware Road bomber made videos with him dressed in combat with appropriate messages to be played after his death which are in the public domain.His message and admission are beyond any doubt. His family accept them and are deeply ashamed of them Germaine Lindsay had been arrested at school for handing out Al Qaeda leaflets and had been involved in other attempted terrorist acts in Pakistan. The house where the bombs were made was rented in his name Shehzad Tanweer had travelled with Khan to Pakistan and had also been involved in other activities.He also left a video with the message "What you have witnessed now is only the beginning of a string of attacks that will continue and become stronger." Hasib Hussain had made constant references to the 9/11 people being heroes and had expressed his support for Al qaeda over and over again All had been to radical schools in Pakistan to "study". Associates of these 4, people who knew them and spent time with them, know these as facts. Your version of the knowledge (which is in public domain) is purely theory by those with a deliberate cause, due to a hatred of authority.(sound familiar?) 2 of these guys bought the chemicals and equipment used to make the bombs as has been proven by shop CCTV and receipts found in their properties. What bit don't you understand ?
BR	Which bit of what I have written do you not believe ? Everything that I said in my post has been in the public domain and proved.
mikemacca	BR wrote: I always felt uneasy that the bombers could continue to bomb an hour after the first attack when London should have been locked down. In addition the speed they IDd the bombers despite not having any CCTV of them is very strange. But until the BBC programme last week I had accepted the official story like most people. Now facts are coming out which totally undermine that story to the extent that I dont believe it at all now. I have not got a clue what happened because there seems to be an evidence vacuum - like there was about TOMLINSON when they said their was no CCTV......but were then forced to release it when PRIVATE footage was leaking out all over the place. The POLICE hid the DE MENEZES footage as well until they were forced by the IPCC to hand it over. In addition whenever the POLICE kill someone the CCTV seems to break or not work. We are being taken for fools on a daily basis by the authorities. We have more CCTV than any other place in the World - yet 4 guys with MASSIVE rucksacks walking around key spots in London are not on CCTV. The only conclusion I can draw from that now is that unless they provide CCTV footage of where these guys were on that day - then the whole story is actually ficticious. The men may not even have boarded a train at LUTON - but were intercepted earlier and assassanated. Where are the platform CCTV from LUTON showing them waiting for the train and boarding it ? Thamselink has cameras on every platform feeding a central CCTV centre for EVERY platform. They all work and so where is this footage ? Where is the footage showing them getting off at THAMESLINK. The staircase away from the platform at the old THAMESLINK had 6 cameras alone including FACE RECOGNITION ( I used that station and had counted them all and IDd them all ) I live on a small suburban street in North London - we now have 4 massive CCTV cameras on a street only 200 yards long. On the roundabout at the end we now have a new massive CCTV mobile camera which can move all directions and is equipped with number plate tech and facial recognition. These cameras have appeared recently at most junctions which include roundabouts in London. In addition the Numberplate Cameras only ( Those little Tunnel Style Cameras - often 4 to 8 of them on one gantry ) have appeared on all A ROADS around outer London and travelling into inner London meaning that every car coming into London is now mapped from the edge of London. Of course the congestion charge zone has a set of cameras as well. So linking all of these together we should be able to say exactly where anyone was at any given time on any given day if they were travelling. Yet there is no evidence........that can only mean one thing.....they did not do it. you should start your rants with "once upon a time"