cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Come on Pat? Who is Pat?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Anthony robbiex wrote:
Give if 2 or 3 years for Murray stands a real chance of winning wimbledon.
Nadal is less than a year older than Murray, so even time is not really on his side. His best chance of a Grand Slam would be in the USA or Australia on the hard courts.
robbiex I never thought for a minute that Murray would win. It is all hype and not based on any facts. Murray has only ever been in one grand slam final, where he got trounced by Federer. Roddick has been in several and has won the USA open. Nadal will probably be back next year, which will mean Murray will stand even less chance next year. Give if 2 or 3 years for Murray stands a real chance of winning wimbledon.
mikemacca JK2006 wrote:
Murray out - I shall be rooting for Roddick in the final (not a hope in hell).



First decent grass court player he comes up against and he's out.

The way the "experts" were talking before the match it was a foregone conclusion that Murray would win.

They were wrong.
JK2006 Murray out - I shall be rooting for Roddick in the final (not a hope in hell).
JK2006 Tie break third set - anyone else nervous?