cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: PANORAMA : The Police have lost the streets to racists
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
mikemacca what do they expect? They go to the shittiest part of a pretty shitty City and managed to find a handful of racists.

How about putting a white couple on a predominantly asian estate in Blackburn or Burnley and secretly filming them ?
david the mother of the child emailed the Jeremy Vine show on radio 2 saying she was shocked and appalled and never knew he got up to that kind of stuff. She said her son wanted to write to the woman to apologise.
robbiex The racism in the programme was horrible, although not shocking. In the 70s and 80s kids were openly called chocolate drop/ paki etc, particularly on council estates.

I did feel that some of the abuse was teased, with the young woman and man hanging around waiting for something to film. However they should be allowed to hang around unthreatened. Also there was no retribution, convictions could be made against the thug who punched the young asian guy on the side of the head.

As regards the 11 year old who isn't criminally responsible, that is nonsense. Everyone knows the difference between right and wrong well before 11. Just because he isn't given sex education doesn't mean that he should be allowed to create violence on the street unhindered. Also he wouldn't be physically capable of having sex and I don't think we should encourage curiosity about sex to thuggish 11 year olds.
BR But JK the criminal age of responsibility is 10 years old think. Therefore a child can consent to murder at that age. It is just sex that he/she he has to wait until 16 or 18 if it is a teacher because teachers are er..potential paedos.

Veritas - you are right.
david shocking, shocking programme.

frighteneing to know there are people who think and act like that.