King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: government legalised kiddie porn..
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Locked Out	I agree that we must take whatever our government says with a pinch of salt, be it in matters of "terrorism" or anything else. What I do not think is a good idea is for someone to post allegedly "authotitative" and "well informed" comment deliberately sexed up {you remember the universal concern about that particular practice when it was employed by the Government...}. We have no right to criticise anyone when we allow sophistry like this to pass unnoticed and unquestioned simply because it suits us. If we hold the Government to rigorous account we need to apply that same scrupulouness to our own postings. Anything else is simple hypocrisy. If there is no terrorism {as BR claims} then who takes responsibility for the fate of PanAm Flight 103? No terrorism, no bomb. However, BR also tells us there was a bomb. Whoever planted it - Mossad, MI6, the CIA the Lybian Secret Service or whoever - was guilty of terrorism. So is there "terrorism" or not? I'm still confused as to what people really think. And, as yet, my point remains unanswered. I'd hazard a guess that that's because the posting I flagged up was deeply flawed and pretty indefencible to start with and needed to be questioned. An answer to the point would be nice.
In The Know	Locked Out wrote: Either terrorism is real or it's not. IT IS NOT There has not been a single "terrorist" act in the UK (as defined by the Government, who are trying to convince us that we are under constant threat from terrorists abroad). July 7th was committed by BRITISH subjects - born and brought up here. They were outraged by what was being done in their name. Similarly the "attack" on Glasgow airport.
Locked Out	Spot the contradiction in the folowing words: "Lockerbie ( and the bomb was in the hold - not on the person )" "Terrorism does not exist. It is a creation of BUSH and BLAIR and the ruling classes in order to make money and bring in silly laws." While I see what you are getting at, BR, you do your case no good by posting things like this. Either terrorism is real or it's not. You can't have it both ways. That Lockerbie was the result of terrorist activity is beyond argument. We can argue about who was responsible 'til the cows come home. Don't shoot yourself in the foot, BR. It's much more fun to let me do it.
notme	Reading about this made me laugh. It would indeed be funny if ZanuLabor's overzealous and poorly defined anti-pedo laws put a spanner in their overzealous anti-terrorisim efforts. Ulrika Johnsonn recently paid 20 zillion quid to have 'the body of a 16 year old girl'. Surely her plastic surgeon should be arrested for virtual child pornography offences (creating a sexual image of a person who appears to be under 18)?
BR	How many planes have been blown out of the sky without this technology....... Lockerbie ( and the bomb was in the hold - not on the person ) and........ Terrorism does not exist. It is a creation of BUSH and BLAIR and the ruling classes in order to make money and bring in silly laws.