cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: more bizarro morality in the US and probably coming to you too
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 You'll see an interesting passage in 65 where the police are indeed grilling me about a black and white photo of a kid in swimming trunks - me!
DR2 I think this is one of the most bizzare cases I've read about so far. A soldier has a pretty innocent (by the standards of anyone with the slightest iota of common sense) photo of a four year old relative (his neice, I believe) in a swim suit and gets charged with possessing child porn because of it. By that standard of craziness, I reckon the sixty years old black and white photos of me, aged 3 years, happily building sandcastles on Southport beach in 1950 could be classed as child porn by these numbskulls. Especially as I'm wearing my little swimming trunks. "Why have you got photos of yourself as a little boy in the family album?" they may ask. "Why shouldn't I have photos of myself as a little boy in the family album?", I would ask in return. Am I in some horrible bloody nightmare, or is this really happening in the modern world?
Chris Retro It will be a fit-up. He'll have spoken out-of-turn to someone or his face won't fit or somesuch - the forces have been at it for years using similar tactics as do the Police and many other organisations.
It's what paedo-hysteria and it's nouveaux laws were invented for - a weapon.
veritas JK2006 wrote:
I suspect there is more to this than meets the eye; either he's being set up or he's not being honest with his family.

possiblly..one can never belive a 'news' report at face value from either point of view.

however you point out something important..I'm sure it would be so easy to set up someone this way.
Blackit Here's another link to a different report of the same story :

www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/01/mom-...ving-child-porn.html
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk