cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Ten year old boys remanded in custody for rape of 8 year old girl
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
veritas such conundrums !..of course the definition of 'rape' could be something bordering on innocent fiddling or it could be sinister. (actually "school uniform" could mean just about anything)

I know one thing..it's never been a better time to get old !
Innocent Accused 'Tough on crime,& tough on the causes of crime'
Seems being tough on crime these days is getting 'em locked up early.
What kind of a sad world have they made for us?
JK2006 According to The Sun they appeared in court "in their school uniforms".

Oh yes? Do we believe that?

And can anyone tell me how, if children under 16 are not capable of consenting, they can be legally considered to know that an act without consent is illegal? And who can say which party, the 10 or the 8 year old, were committing a crime? Surely, by legal definition, both?