cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Abortionists are at it again !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Blackit wrote:
Might lead me to becoming blacklisted here again, but I have a lot of sympathy with what your are saying ITK.

Well, if we get both get banned, Blackit, for speaking the truth and daring to challenge the audacity of child murderers, at least we'll be in good company.

Welcome to the world of the sane !
In The Know Plissken wrote:
You know what, ITK? I'm not going to bother with you anymore.

Much as I choose to ignore the hate filled rantings of certain UK newspapers, I think I shall do the same with regards to your posts.


This weekend is turning out better than expected !
In The Know david wrote:
my point is that, although in normal, verbal conversation with ITK I may find some common ground, he started this thread in such an obnoxious, venomous tone that it made me instantly want to disagree with him.

Note to ITK- you may have some valid points, but if you start off subjects by calling people 'These child-murdering whores' what do you think you're going to achieve? Who are you hoping to convert?

Why not try arguing your point reasonably?

You'll only alienate people with your current style.


Quite possibly, David ... but look at it another way ... unless you GRAB attention (must be my marketing background) there is more than a small chance that you will get no attention at all !

After all, am I not doing just what John & Yoko did ?
Blackit I DO believe that women, with the majority not having much time for sex and doing it just to please the male and to create babies, will ultimately and very soon get a social ban on all sex.
Procreation will be by artificial insemination only.


I agree that this is how things are shaping up, and also by the way, this is why women are happier in anti-sex conservative islamic countries than they are in the 'liberated' west (despite what chivalrous white knight Islamaphobes wish to believe).

But there are a couple of things that give me hope.

Technology can change everything - particularly reproductive technology. It's a common view that the introduction of the contraceptive pill changed society, and in fact, triggered second wave feminism.

In the next few decades we will see many such game changing technological developments. For example, only last week the FDA gave approval to a medication that increases female libido.

We really can't predict what the future will hold. Only that it will be very, very different to today.

The other hope is that there is a large and growing 'men's rights' movement emerging. Unsurprisingly, this movement is highly conservative and reactionary at the moment, but that is likely to change.

The reality that it is feminists who have perverted their own noble cause who are largely responsible for the growing 'anti-sex' trends in society. This has been masked rather by the Bush Neo-con religious loons being in power in America. Obama's election of the Femi-Nazi Elena Kagan as supreme court judge might be what it takes to wake men up to what women are doing to them (her first act was to rule that sex offenders can be held indefinately by the state AFTER they have served their sentances).

There are nearly a million sex offenders now in America (the vast majority men who have broken laws created or lobbied for by women). A couple of states have recently ruled that the death penalty can be used for non-fatal sex offences - in fact, one state tried to introduce it for the crime of viewing child pornography. Sooner or later, men are going to realise what is happening to them. ...That is, of course, unless the sexist and degrading white knight mentality, expressed by BR in another post, is so genetically ingrained in men that we would chivalrously hold open the doors of our own execution chambers for the feminists who are leading us into them.
david my point is that, although in normal, verbal conversation with ITK I may find some common ground, he started this thread in such an obnoxious, venomous tone that it made me instantly want to disagree with him.

Note to ITK- you may have some valid points, but if you start off subjects by calling people 'These child-murdering whores' what do you think you're going to achieve? Who are you hoping to convert?

Why not try arguing your point reasonably?

You'll only alienate people with your current style.