cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Teachers given ANON status against False Allegations BUT not if they are charged
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
BR www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1292667...given-anonymity.html

A step forward in the right direction. But why not go all the way. This sends the signal that a TEACHER is GUILTY if charged by the POLICE. We all know from "Innocent Accused" that this is not the case and that 95% of people charged with any form of historic abuse are innocent. In addition for teachers that possibly rises to 99% because the POLICE are anti - teacher - and anti - Christian ( I have interviewed back in early 2000s a Child Protection Team who all were anti teacher and almost became purple with rage when God was mentioned.......)

The ANON status should be the same for both the CHILD and TEACHER ( Equal rights ) and ONLY if the teacher is found guilty should their name be revealed. Then we may see equality return to the schools. This would count for ALL allegations against teachers by students.