King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Jane Asher
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Innocent Accused	In The Know wrote: Innocent Accused wrote: Tossers are everywhere ITK, not just amongst drug abusers Good point, IA ... BUT the drug abusers COST us money ! LOL ITK,as do the corrupt police who we pay to try to catch them
In The Know	Innocent Accused wrote: Tossers are everywhere ITK, not just amongst drug abusers Good point, IA ... BUT the drug abusers COST us money !
Innocent Accused	In The Know wrote: Innocent Accused wrote: Any personal intake of substances should be up to the individual,not the nanny state. ... and will they sign a disclaimer absolving the NHS from ALL costs involved in subsequently treating them ? The streets are full of substance abuse tossers / winos already. As I've said many times before .... freedom comes with responsibility (not to be leaches on society). What are the costs now in police/customs/crime to fund it etc? I lived in a drug cesspit in Bradford in the early 90s,and have first hand experience of how it affects a community. There is no easy answer,but I'd say the costs of making drugs illegal outweighs those of legalization.Also it removes all the organized crime involved around the scene. Tossers are everywhere ITK,not just amongst drug abusers
In The Know	A very good point, veritas. You could also argue that as most of these abusers die in the 40s anyway - we ought to give them as much as they want and speed up the process?
veritas	In The Know wrote: Innocent Accused wrote: Any personal intake of substances should be up to the individual,not the nanny state. ... and will they sign a disclaimer absolving the NHS from ALL costs involved in subsequently treating them ? The streets are full of substance abuse tossers / winos already. As I've said many times before .... freedom comes with responsibility (not to be leaches on society). a fair point although we already treat drug victims-alcoholics- for free. Considering that the illicit drug industry is the worlds' biggest criminal enterprise and cost governments billions in wasted funds combating human desire I think it would be cheaper to legalise, control the quality and so on. The cost of treating addicts would be a fraction by comparison.